Skip to main content

DA drops sexual assault charges against Texas CME bishop, cites insufficient evidence

Associated Press - September 26, 2008 4:25 AM ET

ARLINGTON, Texas (AP) - The Tarrant County district attorney's office says it doesn't have enough evidence for a conviction and is dropping sexual assault charges against Christian Methodist Episcopal Bishop Kenneth Wayne Carter.

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports Assistant Tarrant County District Attorney Betty Arvin told the newspaper that the office dropped the case Wednesday after reviewing all of the evidence.

The attorney representing the alleged victim in a civil lawsuit, Tony Owens, said his client is disappointed and feels -- in his words -- "victimized again by the system."

Owens said the outcome doesn't affect the civil case.

Carter -- who's 51 -- was indicted by a Tarrant County grand jury in June after a licensed minister at a Dallas CME church said Carter in March 2007 tried to force him to have sex when the man applied for a job.

A month after the indictment, the Christian Methodist Episcopal College of Bishops said it was suspending Carter with pay until his criminal case was resolved.

In depositions, Carter admitted to having a consensual sexual encounter with the man, in depositions.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

EDITORIAL COMMENT: This is yet another example of a District Attorney (DA) taking the decision out of the jury's hands after already investing significant resources into the investigation. The DA dropped the charges despite the fact that a grand JURY returned an indictment which suggests that there was evidence. Whether or not it was sufficient is up to the jury to decide. It is far more likely that the DA made the decision to drop charges because it's arguably not an ideal case to try, much less win. It involves a high profile defendant (bishop) and an arguably not so credible victim (a man who the jury will view as capable of defending himself). Furthermore, the victim filed a civil case shortly after the indictment. Even so, this case SHOULD BE TRIED and the aforementioned challenges should NOT dissuade the prosecution. How else will progress be made? The criminality of unlawful sexual conduct should be punished by the State regardless of the defendant's status or the victim's gender. It should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law even if the victim is pursuing a civil case. After all, the victim is merely enforcing his legal rights and should not be persecuted for doing so. Instead, he should be applauded for his courage.

All to often, DAs are intimidated by the defense's delay tactics or if a civil suit is pending, by the defense's trial strategy to destroy the complaining witness's credibility during cross examination by bringing up the civil lawsuit. The result? The defense plants a seed that the victim was not really assaulted and is instead exploiting a consensual encounter for money. This bias is based on the jury's or society's misperception that victims (complaining witness) file criminal charges. They don't.

DAs file criminal charges after a grand jury returns an indictment for those charges. A grand jury that reviews evidence the police has collected and hears the testimony of witnesses. (Whether or not the trial judge admits the evidence pre-trial is a whole other issue). Despite the grand jury's indictment, it is the DA that drives the case from there. The victim in the case testifies as "complaining witness" and does not dictate how the case is prosecuted. True, their testimony is central to a case but if you have a witness who is willing to testify, then let them. It becomes a his word against his word. Even if he refuses to testify, the State's case is not shot because the State can rely on other evidence. The State can subpoena the witness, charge the witness if he refuses to appear, and most importantly, encourage the witness to file his civil suit after trial to combat the defense and strengthen the witness's credibility.

The solution is to try the case, let the jury decide if this was a sexual assault or a consensual encounter. Otherwise, what is the message being sent to victims of such crimes? If prosecutors do not try cases, victims will stop reporting. That can't happen. It is the duty of public officials such as DAs to try cases in which the grand jury finds that there is enough to indict. Victims must report so that they can enforce their civil rights in a civil suit, deter the perpetrator from committing more crimes, and at the very least, try the defendant in the court of public opinion.

Popular posts from this blog

Texas State Affairs Committee hears testimony on two adoption bills

On March 27, 2017, Ms. Cochran-Green testified before the Texas Senate State Affairs Committee on two adoption-related bills, SB 329 and
SB 1362.  You can watch the live testimony here. Ms. Cochran-Green's testimony is the Part 1 of the State Affairs Meeting on March 27.  Her testimony is in the second hour and she testified separately on each bill.

SB1362 is authored by Sen. Campbell in which she proposes changes to the voluntary adoption registry.  Ms. Cochran-Green testified her opposition to the bill as much of the proposed bill is already codified in the Texas Family Code and is common practice among adoption agencies.

SB329 is authored by Senator Creighton in which he proposes to allow adult adopted persons to obtain their original birth certificates at the age of 18.  Ms. Cochran-Green supports this bill as it allows adopted persons in closed adoptions primarily from the 1930s-1990s to seek reunions with their birth parents and obtain medical history that is needed.  This…

Mother's Day: A Time for Reflection and Celebration

This is the time of year that we celebrate motherhood, not only the day-to-day life of being a mom, but also the journey itself.  For some, infertility challenges that journey.  Thankfully there are more options than ever for those who want to become a mother. For many, like myself, the solution was adoption.  I am so thankful for the miracle of adoption, but is it right for you?  The following questions may help you find your answer.
Are you emotionally prepared for adoption? As with making any family planning decision, adoption requires a lot of self-reflection. It also requires that you come to terms with any grief you are experiencing resulting from infertility issues. A friend who adopted told me that she decided to adopt because the chances of becoming a parent were much higher than IVF. That’s true, but there are other challenges to consider. Open adoption is now the norm and it is recommended by experts in the field. Consequently, birth parents will become a part of your famil…

Documents Every Graduating Senior and College Student Needs

Now that high school graduation is upon us, it’s a time for celebration and reflection for parents and students alike. For parents, you now face the fact that your little bird is leaving the nest.  Is he or she ready? Legally, they are adults now and entitled to privacy protections. This means that even though your child may be relying on your financial support, privacy laws prohibit financial institutions, medical providers and colleges from disclosing private information concerning your child unless authorized. In case of an emergency, your child needs the following documents in place for you to be able to help them and make decisions on their behalf:
  1. Durable Power of Attorney: This document allows you to manage their financial affairs (either immediately or in the future) should they travel abroad or become mentally or physically unable to do so. This includes managing their financial accounts,  renewing their car registration, or filing a tax return on their behalf.
  2. Medica…