Skip to main content

US Supreme Court refuses to hear free speech issue in Nebraska rape case

The US Supreme Court has refused to hear a rape case in which the defendant Pamir Safi was charged with raping the victim while she was unconscious. At trial, a Lancaster County [Nebraska] District Court Judge Jeffrey Cheuvront ordered the victim not to use the terms rape, sexual assault, attack, force, or victim in her trial testimony, requiring her instead to describe the acts as “sex” and “intercourse.” The judge also forbade use of the phrase “rape kit” and ordered witnesses to say “sexual examination kit” to describe the process conducted on the victim after the incident. The “sexual assault nurse examiner” was to be described as a “sexual examiner”. While it is not uncommon for a judge to control the language and evidence used by state actors, such as prosecutors and police, an order against a private person raises constitutional free speech concerns which would be addressed in the appeal before the US Supreme Court filed by the victim's attorney, Wendy Murphy.

I have followed this case for over a year along with Wendy Murphy, a professor of mine at New England Law. I provided research assistance for the federal appeal and even published an article analyzing the issue in the Sexual Assault Report back in August of 2007. You can read the article here.

The case is an interesting one because it involves the victim's right to provide testimony in her own words. The judge banned the use of the word rape, sexual assault, victim, force and other terms that are commonly used when a victim, or rather the complaining witness, testifies in a sexual assault case. Attorney Murphy argues in an appeal that the gag order violates Ms. Bowen's free speech rights. I agree. Although the defense often argues that the term rape or sexual assault is a conclusory term and thus prejudicial, the defense is likewise not prevented from saying that it was consensual sex, also a conclusion and thus prejudicial to the prosecutor's case. The scales are therefore tipped in the defendant's favor because at trial, the defendant's so called constitutional rights are valued more than the complaining witness's free speech constitutional rights. The end result? The complaining witness's credibility is undermined every time she pauses to reflect on terminology that will not violate the order and if she slips, she is chastised or even charged with attempt.

The ultimate issue is whether the complaining witness (victim) unilaterally consented. In this case, Tory Bowen was unconscious. She woke up with the defendant raping her. Whoops. I meant she woke up to find that the defendant was forcing his penis... to discover that the defendant was... was... was.. pushing his penis painfully, hurtfully, etc. See how difficult that it is just to write? It starts to sound like consensual sex doesn't it? Now imagine using such language in front of the jury who is unaware of the gag order. Most likely they will find the complaining witness's stammering or choice of language is incredible. That's why it is critical that she testify using her own words. Likewise, if the defendant chooses to testify (not going to happen), then his story must be told in his own words. Let the jury determine who is telling the truth and determine whether if there was consent that is whether it was rape or sexual intercourse.

Read today's article on the case, Court won't consider Neb. `rape' testimony issue.

Popular posts from this blog

Texas State Affairs Committee hears testimony on two adoption bills

On March 27, 2017, Ms. Cochran-Green testified before the Texas Senate State Affairs Committee on two adoption-related bills, SB 329 and
SB 1362.  You can watch the live testimony here. Ms. Cochran-Green's testimony is the Part 1 of the State Affairs Meeting on March 27.  Her testimony is in the second hour and she testified separately on each bill.

SB1362 is authored by Sen. Campbell in which she proposes to changes to the voluntary adoption registry.  Ms. Cochran-Green testified her opposition to the bill because much of the proposed bill is already codified in the Texas Family Code and is common practice among adoption agencies.

SB329 is authored by Senator Creighton in which he proposes to allow adult adopted persons to obtain their original birth certificates at the age of 18.  Ms. Cochran-Green supports this bill as it allows adopted persons in closed adoptions primarily from the 1930s-1990s to seek reunions with their birth parents and obtain medical history that is neede…

Mother's Day: A Time for Reflection and Celebration

This is the time of year that we celebrate motherhood, not only the day-to-day life of being a mom, but also the journey itself.  For some, infertility challenges that journey.  Thankfully there are more options than ever for those who want to become a mother. For many, like myself, the solution was adoption.  I am so thankful for the miracle of adoption, but is it right for you?  The following questions may help you find your answer.
Are you emotionally prepared for adoption? As with making any family planning decision, adoption requires a lot of self-reflection. It also requires that you come to terms with any grief you are experiencing resulting from infertility issues. A friend who adopted told me that she decided to adopt because the chances of becoming a parent were much higher than IVF. That’s true, but there are other challenges to consider. Open adoption is now the norm and it is recommended by experts in the field. Consequently, birth parents will become a part of your famil…

Free Workshop for Divorcees and Widows held in Dripping Springs on Friday, October 14

Jennifer Cochran-Green is hosting a workshop for divorcing and grieving women to approach legal and financial decisions in confidence.  The workshop will  be held  on Friday, October 14, from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Dripping Springs Community Library at 501 Sportsplex Drive in Dripping Springs. The format is a lunch and learn where light refreshments will be provided and attendees may bring their own lunch if they choose. Jennifer will deliver a presentation focused on issues impacting children immediately after a death of a parent or during divorce.  Leanne Layne, an estate planning attorney with Kernodle Layne Group and Amy Colton, Wealth Advisor with Forefront Wealth Solutions will deliver presentations on making decisions about estate planning and financial issues. 
"I'm so excited to bring this seminar to the Dripping Springs community at no cost to attendees.  Throughout my career, I have found that many women are often caught off guard by their finances when in…